DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33944>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33944





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-04-08 19:20 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> It appears that you are right - that the ASP.NET module with .NET 1.1 does 
> set 'X-AspNet-Version'.  I suspect from my early tests that .NET 1.0 did not.
> 
> We can still handle this, but should ensure that X-AspNet-Version specifically
> does not merge headers, but instead overwrites the value.  Some, like Cookie,
> must merge.  Many other headers should not.
>

What I can't understand is what is responsible for sending the header. With NO
modifications to the httpd.conf or to the asp.net module itself the
'X-AspNet-Version' header is being sent under Apache on my machine when handling
Asp.Net pages.

As I stated initially this was not the case before.

So what I'm trying to get across is this may not be a bug or feature limitation
at all or if it is it is only present under certain circumstances which I can't
figure out a cause of.

So to lay out my experience up to this point:

1. ASP.Net on Apache works just like Asp.Net on IIS except VS.Net thinks that
projects opened on Apache server are ASP 1.0.

2. Realize the only difference in responses is 'X-AspNet-Version' header is
missing from Apache response.

3. Modify httpd.conf to send 'X-AspNet-Version: 1.1.4322'

4. VS works as it should.

5. File this bug

6. Check headers later and notice 'X-AspNet-Version: 1.1.4322,1.1.4322'

7. Remove statement in httpd.conf.

8. Header is sent but WITHOUT duplicate version numbers

9. Everything still works fine with no modifications

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Reply via email to