On Fri, 21 Aug 2026 01:01:06 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov <[email protected]> wrote:
> Maybe it will be better to include some variant of just "Windows_ALL" or > something like that? So it will not be necessary to update these checks for > future Windows versions? I do not think we will enable D3D for the basic > driver or on Intel. We have already 'OS_ALL' which is in fact 'WINDOWS_ALL' because the D3D code is only relevant on Windows. So why have both 'OS_ALL' and 'WINDOWS_ALL' ? ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32011#discussion_r3869804049
