I agree with Walt, and there is no need to pressure the Prags, we are on it! :-)
That said, it would be *very* helpful to me if we could get the lazyness thing settled this week... Stuart > Regarding Programming Clojure: > > I think that placing the burden of "book vs actual" incompatibility > upon Rich is misplaced. If anything, pressure from the Clojure > community should be placed on the Pragmatic Programmers to allow > Stuart to "do the right thing" regarding when the book is released, > viz., when Clojure has stabilized. > > Realize who is making the open contribution and who is profiting from > that contribution and keep the priorities straight. > > My 2 cents. > > Walt > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
