On Feb 16, 2009, at 5:35 PM, Mark Engelberg wrote:
>
> Browsing the source code for LazySeq, I noticed that isEmpty is
> implemented as follows:
> public boolean isEmpty() {
> return count() == 0;
> }
>
> Since count realizes the whole list, this seems like a bad way to test
> for empty on a lazy sequence.
>
>
Fixed in (lazy) 1286 - thanks for the report.
Rich
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
