On Feb 15, 12:18 pm, Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm pretty much finished with the fully-lazy implementation and am
> happy so far with the results. I think this will be an important
> addition to Clojure and am planning to add it.

Thanks all for the feedback!

It seems the Sequence/ISeq dichotomy was a sticking point for many.
After some tweaking, I've been able to get rid of Sequence entirely,
SVN 1284+ in lazy branch. This is source compatible with 1282 (first/
rest/next), except that sequence? no longer exists - go back to seq?.

New docs here:

http://clojure.org/lazy

Let me know if that is simpler.

Rich

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to