> I'm not sure which old-map you mean here.  If you mean the old
> lazy-cons version, using your above macro, this will have too many
> lazy-seq calls.


Yeah, you're right  ... I managed to confuse myself.

Off the top of my head I can't think of a nicer way to write lazier- 
map than what you've got.  Hmmm...

-Jason



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to