On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 1:35 PM Alex Miller <a...@puredanger.com> wrote:
> You can talk about Clojure operations from a type perspective, but I think > when you do so, you are largely missing the point of Clojure. > > Having used Clojure for a very long while, I will have to respectfully disagree with this one. Clojure tries to help you reason about programs, and so do other tools, we're all on the same team. Not sure if OP is trying to use clojure to understand computers or clojure. Some ideas that help large programs can be a distraction on really small ones, like polymorphism. Simple Made Easy only really speaks to people once they've felt the pain of living in the kind of larger-scale mess it addresses and now devs suddenly have a vocabulary to explain it, it's not really going to make sense sooner. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
