On 18/04/2009, at 5:38 PM, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
> > On 18.04.2009, at 01:13, Dan wrote: > >> do you prefer to have some clojure users united against subversion, >> or divided by Rich not having chosen their preferred DVCS >> (Mercurial users vs Git users, not sure whether clojure needs those >> kinds of nonsense internal wars in the community ....) >> >> We seem to be unanimous in preferring git. > > Not at all. I am a convinced Mercurial user, for example, and I don't > even have git installed on my machine (I do have svn). However, I > didn't participate in this debate because I think it is pointless. > VCS issues are as much a matter of personal preference as technical > merit. It's Rich who does all of the commits, so it's for him to > choose. That's not the case for contrib. If Rich is the only committer *and contributor* to core, then it's a moot point what VCS is used for core. Antony Blakey ------------- CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd Ph: 0438 840 787 A Buddhist walks up to a hot-dog stand and says, "Make me one with everything". He then pays the vendor and asks for change. The vendor says, "Change comes from within". --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
