On Apr 18, 3:15 am, John Newman <john...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I do not agree with John Newman that the Java standard library
> > should be the Clojure standard library.
>
> I'm not saying that. I'm saying that:
>
John, I misunderstood what you were trying to say. My apologies!
There seems to be some agreement that the current contrib is not well-
defined and probably not the best long-term solution. I don't think
that it was meant to be. Most of us seem to agree that, while this is
important, it shouldn't stop us for going to 1.0. At the same time, we
should continue working this issue as a community.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
