Hi, Am 08.07.2010 um 18:52 schrieb Mike Meyer:
> People seem to be confused by the Java namespace convention deriving > names from DNS. They think that the names actually have something to > do with the domains in question. This isn't the case. Quoting the > Java Language Specification "The suggested convention for generating > unique package names is merely a way to piggyback a package naming > convention on top of an existing, widely known unique name registry > instead of having to create a separate registry for package names." Hmm… The maven central guys seem to have a different opinion. There you get the group-id only if you *own* the domain. As for your earlier question: renaming a project on fork allows easy identitfication of the "official" project. Compare: vimclojure frobnicator hotzenplotz to de.kotka.vimclojure meyers.mike.vimclojure kasperle.vimclojure So which is the original vimclojure project? Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
