Hello Laurent, Am 09.07.2010 um 18:30 schrieb Laurent PETIT:
> But still I prefer to have the library name at the end of the namespace, it's > easier to spot than in the middle (e.g. I prefer net.cgrand.parsley to > paredit.core) Now that is a strange argument. net.cgrand.parsley vs. parsley.api. Why should at the end be easier to spot than at the beginning? In particular because parsley.api just contains relevant information while net.cgrand.parsley contains quite a bit of noise. I consider the origin to be noise in the code. Of course it is a fact with some weight when evaluating a library whether it was written by Christophe. But in the code this is completely of no relevance. Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
