Rich- > It sounded to me like he was only saying that he's more familiar with > Ruby/Rails than he is with Clojure.
Correct. I think it was a fair question, and I'm happy to provide insights into my decision making process. -Zack On Jul 11, 12:37 pm, Richard Lyman <richard.ly...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Phil Hagelberg <p...@hagelb.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 11:23 PM, zkim <zachary....@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> but what do you think about using Justin's codebase, or an Aleph-based > >>> server to > >>> host the thing instead of Ruby/Rails? (see the link above for more > >>> details) > > >> I'm inclined to move forward with the Ruby / Rails for now. The > >> reason I went with rails is that (in my experience) none of the > >> clojure web libraries are mature enough to do something like > >> clojuredocs as quickly and easily as I personally would be able to do > >> in rails. > > > Could you provide details about what it was specifically that you > > found was lacking? > > > -Phil > > It sounded to me like he was only saying that he's more familiar with > Ruby/Rails than he is with Clojure. It seemed like it was a question > of 'time to finish and tweak' that's shortest for him if he wrote it > in Ruby/Rails. > > Maybe this is a good opportunity to be able to compare two > implementations side-by-side. His excellent solution with one written > in Clojure that produces the same-ish website. > > -Rich -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
