I've never tried it, but I like the idea of test fns returning their results.
On Jul 24, 2013 8:30 AM, "Steven Degutis" <sbdegu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Also, I've been considering having a non-side-effecty way of returning test results. What do people think? It would get rid of the last bit of magic in the lib. > > > ;; current style (side-effecty) > > (defn test-1 [] > (let [foo (get-foo)] > (expect empty? foo) > (expect awesome? foo))) > > ;; proposed style (more functional) > > (defn test-1 [] > (let [foo (get-foo)] > [(expect empty? foo) > (expect awesome? foo)])) > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
