Thanks for sharing. Will check it out.
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Steven Degutis <sbdegu...@gmail.com> wrote: > - Renamed project to "Nevermore" > - Moved repo to https://github.com/evanescence/nevermore > - Test functions are required to return all assertions as a seq > - Added "around-each" fixtures > > The way fixtures and test-suites work (and work together) makes me think > of Datomic. > > -Steven > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Steven Degutis <sbdegu...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Also, I came up with a solution for simple around-each fixtures. It would >> use a declarative style just like (defn ^:test ...), but it would be (defn >> ^:around-each ...). And its metadata would contain a matcher-fn that >> matches against a test-fn's metadata. >> >> This way you could define a bunch of tests marked ^:db, and have an >> around-each fixture with :db as its matcher. >> >> The de-coupling means you don't need grouping or nesting to have multiple >> fixtures applied to multiple tests. It also means you can specify both >> tests and fixtures on a per-feature level. >> >> Unfortunately this solution does't carry over to around-all fixtures, >> because if several tests belong to multiple around-all fixtures, and not >> the same ones either, they would have to be run multiple times. >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Steven Degutis <sbdegu...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> The vast majority of my tests look like: do some setup, do some action, >>> make a half-dozen assertions. Almost always in that order. >>> >>> The only reason I can think of that I would need to have assertions in >>> the middle is if I plan to do more setup and action and assertions >>> afterwards. >>> >>> And in that case, I'm really just writing a second test that should >>> probably be its own test-fn. And if it relies on the setup from the first >>> test, I should probably just extract it out into a function with common >>> setup. >>> >>> I think I'm almost sold on this idea now. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:07 AM, John D. Hume <duelin.mark...@gmail.com >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> I've never tried it, but I like the idea of test fns returning their >>>> results. >>>> >>>> On Jul 24, 2013 8:30 AM, "Steven Degutis" <sbdegu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Also, I've been considering having a non-side-effecty way of >>>> returning test results. What do people think? It would get rid of the last >>>> bit of magic in the lib. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > ;; current style (side-effecty) >>>> > >>>> > (defn test-1 [] >>>> > (let [foo (get-foo)] >>>> > (expect empty? foo) >>>> > (expect awesome? foo))) >>>> > >>>> > ;; proposed style (more functional) >>>> > >>>> > (defn test-1 [] >>>> > (let [foo (get-foo)] >>>> > [(expect empty? foo) >>>> > (expect awesome? foo)])) >>>> > >>>> >>>> -- >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com >>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >>>> your first post. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > -- > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- Regards, Mayank. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
