Hi Alan, thanks for your thorough answer. I had a look at Javelin and
Hoplon and I see there are some very interesting ideas there. I'll be sure
to try them out and give you appropriate feedback.

How's the adoption rate so far, anybody else embracing this approach? What
are, if any, the major problems encountered up to this point in mid size
applications?


On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Alan Dipert <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Saturday, January 4, 2014 4:30:39 PM UTC-5, Frankie Sardo wrote:
> > Out of curiosity I started playing with Elm and the Functional Reactive
> principles. While still a young language and community, it gives you lot of
> food for your thoughts, and I like the idea of completely replacing
> html/css/javascript with one single language. It is particularly remarkable
> how basic tutorials and games are easy to implement with Elm with little to
> no setup compared to the tiresome process of setting up clojurescript. The
> clojure/clojurescript community is way more mature and the language itself
> would have no problems in doing something similar. Any particular reason
> why this has not been attempted or should be avoided? I'm not trying to be
> contentious, I'm honestly curious about your opinion.
>
> Hi Frankie,
> I have shared your interest in FRP and the general topic of dataflow, the
> end result of which was the Javelin library [1] which may interest you.
>  While Javelin was motivated by production use of Flapjax from
> ClojureScript, we chose with Javelin to eschew EventStreams in favor of the
> simpler and generally more familiar spreadsheet metaphor.  We also found
> along the way that FRP falls out of dataflow modulo type inference, the
> marginal utility of which - in our experience - fell completely away with
> EventStreams were gone.  What we really wanted was consistency - of which
> FRP Behaviors are the foundation - and with Javelin, we had it.
>
> Like you I am also interested in the prospect of a single-language
> "environment" with which to program in browsers.  I am interested in this
> because the browser environment is too comprehensive for a browser-agnostic
> language to provide a means for modularity and reuse in and between these
> kind of applications.  Elm delivers this modularity by extending scoping
> rules and other Elm language semantics to every corner of the browser
> platform.
>
> Because the modularity and reuse facilities of ClojureScript don't pervade
> the browser, and because CSS and HTML fragments are independently global
> scopes without composition semantics, we recently released Hoplon [2].
>
> Hoplon is our attempt to deliver an "environment", not unlike Elm, that
> provides the primitives we've found necessary to build and maintain large
> single-page applications, addressing the modularity problem that Elm also
> does.
>
> Unlike Elm, Hoplon is not a language.  It is a set of Clojure and
> ClojureScript libraries that compose under a thin preprocessor.  Also
> unlike Elm, Hoplon and its constituent libraries were designed to cooperate
> with existing HTML/JS/CSS libraries and to be a friendly environment for
> the average frontend dev.
>
> In a nutshell, if you're into Elm you might just be into Hoplon :-)
>
> 1. https://github.com/tailrecursion/javelin
> 2. http://hoplon.io/
>
> --
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "ClojureScript" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/clojurescript/ueRyi982UE0/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
>

-- 
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ClojureScript" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.

Reply via email to