On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Sean Corfield <[email protected]>wrote:
> It sounds like you believe HTML/CSS/JS cannot be abstracted out to > something better, yet ClojureScript itself is such an abstraction, at > least for JS - and we have SASS, LESS, Stylus, etc for abstracting > Sure but ClojureScript also doesn't get much in the way of achieving JS semantics directly in the language for performance reasons when you need it. This is not dissimilar to Clojure's relationship to the JVM. It's just not my impression that Elm has a similar outlook or philosophy about the host. Elm treats JS as something to keep at arms length. That's a very big interop tradeoff again in my own opinion. David -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
