On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 2:38 PM, David Nolen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Frankie Sardo <[email protected]> wrote: >> Can you develop this a little bit further? For example I don't see any >> point for having to care about dom, tags and divs in a UI and anything that >> can abstract this assembly-like jargon for me is more than welcome. > I've been doing production client side work for 8 years now. Anything that > abstracts these things away too much has no future in the industry.
It sounds like you believe HTML/CSS/JS cannot be abstracted out to something better, yet ClojureScript itself is such an abstraction, at least for JS - and we have SASS, LESS, Stylus, etc for abstracting away CSS to varying degrees. The "current" way to build web UIs hasn't improved substantially for years - it involves a huge amount of ridiculously fussy boilerplate and/or complex styling markup. I sure hope we _can_ create something better, something more abstract! I like how Elm attempts to abstract away all that "assembler-level" markup detail. -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/ "Perfection is the enemy of the good." -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
