On Saturday 30 April 2011, Oliver Buchtala wrote: > Am 30.04.2011 19:56, schrieb Oliver Buchtala: > > Am 30.04.2011 19:29, schrieb Alexander Neundorf: > >>> Nowadays, there are ways to deal better with that: linked folders, > >>> virtual folders and linked resources > >> > >> I'm not using Eclipse actively myself, I'm just maintaining the > >> generator. But what people told me is that if the sources are not in a > >> subdir of the project file, then the svn support of Eclipse does not > >> work. > >> Also if the sources are in a linked folder. > >> Did this change ? > > > > Ok. Don't know. I have to check... > > Actually, there happened a lot around folders. Maybe this also works in > > the meantime. > > Nope. This is still not supported. > My personal opinion is that I do not care about eclipse svn support. > Other IDEs don't support this either (or not well). > > Also, in earlier days I have had not too good experiences with > Subversive and Subclipse > and always returned to doing svn from command line or other tools (e.g. > TortoiseSVN). > I looked a bit around in the internet and still find mainly bad remarks > for those both plugins > and suggestions not to do it from within Eclipse.
When I look around my colleagues I find basically only positive remarks about the svn support in Eclipse ;-) This is also my impression from feedback from other users about the Eclipse generators, that the missing svn support in linked folders sucks. Alex _______________________________________________ cmake-developers mailing list cmake-developers@cmake.org http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
