20 years ago a friend told me that 27 feet was the threshold above which
everything gets a lot more expensive.  he was referring to gear sizing
(blocks, sails and everything else) as well as berthing fees, etc ...  I
always remembered that
 
I also have observed over many years the equivalent of the Peter
Principle in boat ownership.  i suspect it applies to a lot more than
boats.  Owners of small and inexpensive boats trade upa  acouple of
times until tehy have a substantial investment in a larger boat.  Once
that boat gets to a time where it is not used sufficiently to justify
the costs of the funds tied up in ownership, maintenance, etc ... it
gets sold and often signals the end of boat ownership for the
indiciduals involved.  by contrast a small 24 footer costs so uch less
to own and maintain that it is more affordable to use infrequently than
a larger boat for these reasons.
 
For those of us on more restricted budgets an bigger more costly venture
needs to be used A LOT to justify tying up a larger percentage of
abvailable funds and time.  
 
A third interesting point of view is with regards to racing.  A larger
boat for cruising is more feasable than a larger boat for racing as
there is continuous replacement and upgrading on a racing boat re sails
etc that is pretty expensive the larg the boat.  there are usually a lot
more sails required for racing which compounds the cost.  One friend
once told me he could probably afford a 40 footer but for racing a J29
can be properly outfitted on his budget (and it is indeed very well
taken care of).  To offset this viewpoint was yet another axiom "A race
boat is a social place so you need a large enough boat to have at least
a crew of 8"
 
whatever ...
 
 

________________________________

From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of David
Risch
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 2:49 PM
To: CNC CNC
Subject: Re: Stus-List Bigger Boat Question


For me it was simple...

There are what I call "boat sectors".  Size bands that incorporates
additional amenities (some call them complexities) and additional costs.

I sold my (not C & C) 30 looking for the next  band of amenities and
commenced looking within that band and within my price range.   In my
case the 37-42'  size range.  In my opinion costs do vary according to
the size within the band but for me it was not appreciable.

It then became an issue  of what boat struck my fancy within that size
band.   For me it was love at first sight.

And although my 30 footer could not sail itself out of a paper bag,   I
was still sad to see her go.   

But I love my 40.  It is amazing how small they get after you get used
to it.   I would not be too afraid of size if that is a primary
consideration.   I sail/dock/moor/deliver her single-handed all the time
and she makes me look good.

David F. Risch
1981 40-2
(401) 419-4650 (cell)


_______________________________________________
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
CnC-List@cnc-list.com

Reply via email to