I'm happy with my hydraulic setup. I think I got pretty good service out of the Navtec units, and the failures were slight leaks, not catastrophes. I do think the cascading tackle is viable with high tech line and blocks / rings led to a manual cam cleat (not winch). This is very much a new school setup (or maybe it's just come around again).
Tim > On Oct 8, 2014, at 5:46 PM, John Pennie <j...@svpaws.net> wrote: > > I’ve heard so many bad stories about hydraulic backstay adjusters that I > don’t doubt them. Having said that I never had a problem with one on three > boats over 15 years. Certainly not the type of failure you’re referring to. > > Without a split backstay your options are limited. Personally I consider > the mechanical adjusters to be worthless. Just too slow and not enough > power… and a nuisance as others mentioned. You could go very old school and > try very beefy blocks led to a dedicated winch but that has its own set of > problems and cost. Short of that, its hydraulic - either self contained > units or components which are even more expensive. I can’t say I’ve heard > much difference from brand N to S. > > After 25 years you may want to cut the Navtec unit a little slack. A new > unit is probably your best option. Of course, you could say the hell with it > a just put a turnbuckle in. Depends how you use the boat. > > John > > > >> On Oct 8, 2014, at 5:32 PM, Tim Goodyear via CnC-List >> <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote: >> >> Bruno, >> >> Have you considered a cascade system? I was racing on a friends boat >> earlier this year and he was going to pull out because his backstay was >> still at Navtec being re-built... We rigged up a cascade system using >> existing parts / line I had on Mojito; varying sizes of Amsteel, high load >> guy blocks and a vang I'd put together while my vang was being rebuilt by >> Navtec (there's a theme here somewhere). It worked out at 24:1 (2:1 x 2:1 x >> 6:1), which would get you 2400 lbs tension with a 100lb pull. Below is a >> link to a 24:1 version and a Beneteau 36.7 I sailed on had a 48:1 like the >> Harken. With only a single attachment point there is a risk of tangles >> versus the multiple chain plates, but Amsteel is slippery stuff, so as long >> as you get the block reeving right it should be OK. >> >> http://www.ericsonyachts.org/infoexchange/showthread.php?11645-Hydraulic-to-Cascading-Backstay-Upgrade >> http://www.harken.com/DeckLayout.aspx?id=14795 >> >> Tim >> Mojito >> C&C 35-3 >> Branford, CT >> >> >>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Bruno Lachance via CnC-List >>> <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote: >>> The 33 is not split backstay, maybe some late models have them but not >>> mine. >>> >>> I can not beleive there is not a better reliable system on the market. >>> anybody with direct experience of the Wichard mechanical wiht ratchet ? i >>> don't even know if the handle pumps up and down or rotates with some sort >>> of relief system hence the ratchet ??? same question about power, but the >>> numbers indicate it would be more than appropriate for my boat. >>> >>> I'm worried to dump more money into hydrolic and be a the same point in a >>> year or two. Worse case scenario i lost the rig, i had to jury something >>> this summer offshore in 25 knots plus when the thing blew on my transom. >>> not fun at all. i bought a spare turnbucle after that one and went on with >>> my vacations. >>> >>> thanks for inputs >>> >>> Bruno Lachance >>> C&C 33 mkII >>> Becassine >>> >>> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 16:45:20 -0400 >>> To: kevindrisc...@gmail.com; cnc-list@cnc-list.com >>> Subject: Re: Stus-List Backstay aduster >>> From: cnc-list@cnc-list.com >>> >>> >>> My 2 cents: >>> I don't think the 33 is a split backstay. The cost to split it and install >>> new chain plates would probably exceed the cost of a hydraulic unit. >>> With a masthead rig I would want more power than you can get with a manual >>> adjuster. >>> >>> >>> Joel >>> 35/3 >>> Annapolis >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Kevin Driscoll via CnC-List >>> <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote: >>> I second the split back with tackle/cam cleat apparatus suggestion. I race >>> a bit with it and Find it straight forward and quick adjusting. Pretty >>> direct feedback on rig tension. >>> >>> KD >>> >>> >>> >>> On October 8, 2014, at 1:13PM, John Pennie via CnC-List wrote: >>> >>> For a 33 you may want to consider one of the fittings that ride on a split >>> backstay from Johnson. Not nearly as eloquent but effective and probably >>> the best value. >>> >>> John >>> >>> On Oct 8, 2014, at 4:06 PM, Jack Fitzgerald via CnC-List >>> <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote: >>> >>> If you race your boat you will find the mechanical back stay adjuster to be >>> a complete PITA. >>> >>> I have a stainless steel Barient back stay adjuster (5/8" pins and uses a >>> winch handle to adjust) that came with my boat back in 1975 to be used in >>> case the original Meriman hydraulic adjusters failed. It did indeed fail >>> and we rigged the Barient and it took all that one could do to crank in >>> enough tension just to straighten the mast >>> >>> Jack Fitzgerald >>> HONEY >>> C&C 39 TM >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Bruno Lachance via CnC-List >>> <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I sent my navtec backstay for a rebuild at Southshore and it seems the over >>> 25 years thing is dammaged (scratch on pump cylinder, not fixable, it still >>> leaks). I'm looking at options and the two on the list are: replace it by >>> the exact same thing (Navtec) or screw hydrolic and go with the mechanical >>> option. Would be a Wichard product, the one with a ratchet or handle with >>> no ratchet, not the wheel. >>> >>> any opinions on that decision would be appreciated regarding reliability >>> and performance (i like to play with that toy!) would a mechanical be too >>> slow to adjust? >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Bruno Lachance >>> C&C 33 mkII >>> Becassine >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album >>> >>> Email address: >>> CnC-List@cnc-list.com >>> To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go bottom of >>> page at: >>> http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album >>> >>> Email address: >>> CnC-List@cnc-list.com >>> To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go bottom of >>> page at: >>> http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album >>> >>> Email address: >>> CnC-List@cnc-list.com >>> To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go bottom of >>> page at: >>> http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Joel >>> 301 541 8551 >>> >>> _______________________________________________ This List is provided by >>> the C&C Photo Album Email address: CnC-List@cnc-list.com To change your >>> list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go bottom of page at: >>> http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album >>> >>> Email address: >>> CnC-List@cnc-list.com >>> To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go bottom of >>> page at: >>> http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album >> >> Email address: >> CnC-List@cnc-list.com >> To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go bottom of >> page at: >> http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com >
_______________________________________________ This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album Email address: CnC-List@cnc-list.com To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go bottom of page at: http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com