Matt,

Is someone arguing that the 4th Amendment applies on the water?  Don't tell
the CG!

Joel

On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 12:15 PM, Matthew L. Wolford via CnC-List <
cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:

> I normally stand down for such things, but I did not want Bill’s
> reproduced article to give everybody a false sense of righteousness when
> the Fish Cops show up.
>
> On a related note, there is currently a case working its way through the
> PA appellate court system on whether the PA Fish and Boat Commission has
> the authority to do warrantless searches (which they call “courtesy
> inspections”).  Our Superior Court recently said no, which is a big deal.
> I’ll inform the list when we have a decision.
>
> *From:* Frederick G Street via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, January 26, 2018 12:01 PM
> *To:* cnc-list@cnc-list.com
> *Cc:* Frederick G Street <f...@postaudio.net>
> *Subject:* Re: Stus-List "Maritime Documentation Center"
>
> Damn — my “sea-lawyering” has been beaten by a “real” lawyer…   :^)
>
> I stand corrected.
>
> — Fred
>
> Fred Street -- Minneapolis
> S/V Oceanis (1979 C&C Landfall 38) -- on the hard in Bayfield, WI   :^(
>
> On Jan 26, 2018, at 10:43 AM, Matthew L. Wolford via CnC-List <
> cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
>
> Fred:
>
>     Yes, I’m saying that’s not the case – at least in Pennsylvania.
>
>     Without getting into a huge legal discussion about the Supremacy
> Clause and federal preemption, there are a lot of subject matters where the
> Feds and the State have what they call “concurrent jurisdiction.”  I don’t
> like the term “jurisdiction,” because in my view jurisdiction deals with
> courts.  That’s why I use terms like “legal authority,” “enforcement
> authority,” or just “authority.”  Recall from grade school that States have
> general police power, while the Federal government supposedly has limited
> powers as enumerated in the U.S. Constitution.  The written limitation was
> almost entirely circumvented by the U.S. Supreme Court’s reinterpretation
> of the Commerce Clause in the 1930s (thanks to FDR), and the Federal
> government now does a lot of things that it did not do historically.  The
> result is a ridiculously complex web of concurrent Federal and State
> authority.  For example, the EPA administers and enforces Federal
> environmental laws, which were enacted under the authority of the Commerce
> Clause.  In PA, the State Department of Environmental Protection
> administers and enforces State environmental laws under its general police
> power, and also administers and enforces Federal law (along with EPA) under
> a delegation arrangement with the EPA.  At the same time, the U.S. Army
> Corps of Engineers has regulatory authority over structures between
> Ordinary High Water Mark and Ordinary Low Water Mark – which makes no sense
> in non-tidal waters because the high/low water mark framework was created
> under English common law to deal with navigable waters under the Public
> Trust Doctrine (waters that rise and fall daily are tidal influenced
> because they are connected to the ocean and were therefore considered
> navigable).  Adding to the complication, Pennsylvania owns the beds under
> navigable waters (as do many other States) and, along with the Corps, has
> regulatory authority between Ordinary High and Low Water Marks.  There are
> local regulatory issues as well.
>
>     So, each State may have its own unique circumstances, but generally
> speaking the Feds and States have concurrent enforcement authority over
> navigable waters within the State.
>
> Matt
> Former PA Deputy Attorney General
> Former DER Assistant Regional Counsel (assigned to water programs,
> including Coastal Zone Management)
> Former DEP Northwest Regional Counsel
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
>
> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each
> and every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list -
> use PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each
> and every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list -
> use PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>
>
>


-- 
Joel
301 541 8551
_______________________________________________

Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each and 
every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list - use PayPal 
to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

Reply via email to