On 29/05/2012, at 10:40 AM, Kyle Sluder wrote: > On May 28, 2012, at 7:59 PM, Graham Cox <graham....@bigpond.com> wrote: > >> Nobody has written a better analysis, critique and alternative suggestion >> for sandboxing than Wil Shipley: >> http://blog.wilshipley.com/2011/11/real-security-in-mac-os-x-requires.html >> >> But Apple haven't taken any notice of this as far as anyone can tell, and >> that's that. We're stuck with it. > > Uh, in 10.8 they implemented almost *exactly* the scheme Wil described: > http://www.apple.com/macosx/mountain-lion/security.html
Yes, but *as well as* sandboxing, not instead of. The current implementation of sandboxing is extremely clunky, full of holes, and solves no real problems. If it were revoked tomorrow, I can't believe anybody here would mourn it - honestly? G. _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
