On Jan 12, 2015, at 8:32 PM, Graham Cox <graham....@bigpond.com> wrote: > > >> On 13 Jan 2015, at 1:18 pm, Charles Srstka <cocoa...@charlessoft.com> wrote: >> >> Now I just put it in plain C/Obj-C functions, because: >> >> 1. The assembly is always there. > > > I agree about just using plain code, as the obfuscation is in the source > mostly, not the resulting object code. > > But if it's built from macros, and then those macros are used whenever you > need to check against licensed/unlicensed, then at least that forces a > would-be attacker to patch every place, not just one. Chances are the work > involved isn't worth the effort. > > --Graham >
Also a waste of time. Once you find one instance of the thing, you can just do a search through the binary of what you found to find all the rest. Charles _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com