> On 13 Jan 2015, at 1:18 pm, Charles Srstka <cocoa...@charlessoft.com> wrote: > > Now I just put it in plain C/Obj-C functions, because: > > 1. The assembly is always there.
I agree about just using plain code, as the obfuscation is in the source mostly, not the resulting object code. But if it's built from macros, and then those macros are used whenever you need to check against licensed/unlicensed, then at least that forces a would-be attacker to patch every place, not just one. Chances are the work involved isn't worth the effort. --Graham _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
