> On Jan 12, 2015, at 9:07 PM, pscott <psc...@skycoast.us> wrote:
> 
> Experience has taught me that copy protection and license keys almost never 
> prevent software piracy, except where the cost of ownership is so low that 
> defeating the protection isn't worth the effort. I don't mean to discourage 
> anyone, but no matter how clever you think your method may be there is 
> certainly someone more clever than you.

Agreed 100%. The harder you make it, the more of a tempting challenge you 
provide to someone. And it only takes one person to upload the crack. In those 
circles it's a badge of honor to be the first to crack an app, and a major way 
of gaining cred.

The Intel version of Mac OS X was absolutely _riddled_ with "integrity checks" 
of this sort to guard against attempts to run OS X on non-Apple hardware. There 
were standard check macros that got inserted multiple times into nearly every 
binary in the OS, from the kernel through Calculator.app. Even so, it didn't 
take very long for people to patch all of them out and get the OS running on 
"Hackintoshes".

As the saying goes, "Locks are there to keep honest people out." The license 
mechanism serves as a reminder to new users that their demo has expired, or 
that the copy they borrowed from their roommate hasn't been paid for yet. It 
won't stop someone who wants to get the app for free and is willing to spend 
five minutes hunting torrents.

—Jens
_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to