Stephan Michels wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
> For some time ago, I tried to replace also the deprecated LogKitManageable
> classes, but the Avalon people don't want to apply my patch :-/
>
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11491
I think it has more to do with the fact that we are all busy and
it keeps slipping through the cracks.
>>>>2. can be done in two steps:
>>>>
>>>> a. move from Component to Service infrastructure as the
>>>>ExcaliburComponentManager supports this.
>>>>
>>>> b. use Fortress/Merlin (don't know the status of those and which one
>>>>makes more sense for Cocoon to be used, so I need some advice of
>>>>Avalonians here)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>What does this mean in terms of compatibility and a stable Cocoon? Are
>>>written components using a CM with Composable and Component still working?
>>>I think noone will recode all the components he has written so far. But
>>>I guess that this is covered.
>>>
>>>So the remaining question is, is fortress/merlin stable and usable?
>>>If these both points can be answered positiv, I would say: +1.
>>>
>>
>>-1 for 2.1. If you read this thread, you will see that the changes are
>>too drastic to make this in 2.1, and it already has loads of changes by
>>itself. This asks for at least 2.5, or even 3.0.
>
>
> Couldn't we release the damn 2.1, and remove all the deprecated classes?
> Then we will have enough room to migrate to Fortress/Merlin or whatever.
By all means, release 2.1. Don't migrate to Fortress until there is an
official release--which I believe work is starting on it now.
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
