SEZ9 commented on PR #11727: URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/11727#issuecomment-5594972608
@DanielLeens thanks for checking the stored body via the API — agreed, if the full "either submit call …" sentence and the closing "Once Blockers 1 and 2 are addressed…" paragraph are there, the record is complete and what I saw was a rendering artifact. No further ask on that. On the ownership-dependency question, I have the mirror problem on this side: your comment as it reaches me ends mid-sentence at "`finishExecutionContext()` (`TaskExecutionService.java:1594-1600`) does `executionContexts.remo`", so I don't have the conclusion from your fresh trace against `18e821c3d`. Rather than assert the answer for you, could you re-post the continuation (plain text is fine)? Specifically: does the `remove(key, value)` path in `finishExecutionContext()`/`finishOwnedResources()` tolerate a leaked entry being present, or does it only behave correctly when the entry is absent? That determines whether the leaked-entry point stays folded into the tracking split we agreed on for Blocker 1, or needs a rollback in this PR alongside the F5 overwrite concern. <!-- streview-comment:912 --> -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
