On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > On 4/3/02 2:45 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > > >> Yes, that's true. I didn't realize that it o.a.c.l was actually a logging > >> framework.... I thought it was an interface we could write to in order to > >> isolate ourselves from changing logger preferences... > > > > It's a logging API, with interfaces you can use to isolated from the > > logger implementation. > > > > However, it seems that the Log.getLogger(foo) pattern is what people have to > use, or are expected to use?
There is no such requirement or expectation AFAIK. Log.getLogger() is extremely easy to use, have the least overhead - that's why most people use that. Nothing prevent you from creating the logger and setting it in a manager application. Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
