> 
> The current implementation recover's the abandoned connection based
> on an inactivity timeout.  So it has to track the last time the
> connection was used.  This more tightly couples it to DBCP.

That sounds like a better implementation as it is unlikely to timeout
long running transactions.  But implementing an Observer pattern in the
Connection, Statement, ResultSet implementations would still allow such
an implementation, right?

john mcnally


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to