On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 15:58:45 +1000 "Vikram Goyal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -1 on any combination. Core / Combo - whatever. I think it is a bad > > idea. > Agree with you that it is a bad idea. Commons was supposed to be it. > Its like trying to factor out a "Commons" out of Commons. I can see > the nightmare and the trouble people will have trying to understand > what a "Combo" is out of Commons. Developers are sensible enough to > realise and factor out common jars. Agreed that it takes time but hey, > thats what we are paid for. I knew that these kind of objections would occur if we thought this package *in* "Jakarta"-Commons Dev list. Briefly, ... How about Apache Commons? Keep the tiny commons.jakarta packages as they are and Apache Commons (http://commons.apache.org/) provides the mixture of Jakarta-Commons, DB-Commons, XML-Commons etc.... Perfect! ;-) Jakarta-Commons would be as it is ... no change. -- Tetsuya ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
