Yes, no problem, 1.2.2. Gary
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tim O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 08:10 > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: RE: [codec] Streamable Codec Framework > > Oleg, this is understood - 1.2.2 should be our LCD for codec. > > Tim > > > On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Tim, Gary, et al > > Streamable codec framework would be a welcome addition to Commons Codec. > > However, as far as we (Commons HttpClient) are concerned, the decision > to > > ditch java 1.2.2 support would render Codec unusable for us (and I'd > guess > > a few other projects that still need to maintain java 1.2.2 > compatibility). > > Not that we like it too much, but because lots of our users still demand > > it. > > > > We are determined to introduce Codec as a dependency for HttpClient as > of > > next point release (currently designated as 2.1). However, I foresee a > lot > > of popular pressure to abandon these plans in favour of retaining java > 1.2.2 > > compatibility, should Codec require Java 1.3.x. > > > > Cheers > > > > Oleg > > > > > Agreed, I just wanted to make make a point WRT 1.4 vs <= 1.4. Now, for > > 1.2.2 > > > vs. 1.3.1, that's a different story. It would be interesting to pool > the > > > various lists for the LCD JRE. > > > > > > Gary > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > -- > ---------------------- > Tim O'Brien > Evanston, IL > (847) 863-7045 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
