On Sat, 20 Dec 2003, __matthewHawthorne wrote:
> Since Maven is so good at generating docs, I'm starting to favor useful > xdocs over long package descriptions. It just seems easier to navigate. Ditto, though I've started to favour turning off the default Maven navigation and setting my own up by hand. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Packages o.a.c.io.input and o.a.c.io.output > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > I'd like to merge these into one package which contains all > InputStreams, OutputStreams, Readers and Writers. Currently, we have 1 > Writer, 0 Readers, and the rest are streams. I just think it makes more > sense to have these classes side by side. For example -- > ProxyInputStream and ProxyOutputStream, DemuxInputStream and > DemuxOutputStream. These classes will most like be used together, and > change together, so lets put them together. Dunno. I'm hesitant on this move as I don't think the Proxy's will be used side by side, though Demux might. > o.a.c.io > - what about putting them in the root package similar to java.io Tidiness. At this stage of IO's life, a package with lots of classes in looks like one that won't scope. A package with a few things in will scope however. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > class o.a.c.io.HexDump > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > This class only has one method, dump(byte[], long, OutputStream, int). > I would like to move this method to IOUtils as dumpHex, then deprecate > and remove the original class. +1 Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
