Okay.. well, it sounds like the consensus is that Ant support is a Good Idea, so we'll keep it.. I'll play around with adding the Ant generation task to maybe our maven site goal so that we keep it up to date.. Mostly it's just an issue of keeping the script up to date with the Maven build.. Dependencies seem to get out of sync quite easily!
Currently, the build is quite simple, and the maven ant plugin works fine for everything, so we'll keep it up to date! Thanks for all the feedback! Eric > -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 11:17 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [general] Do we need to support Ant based builds? > > > On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > C'mon, that one doesn't even run tests! > > 8-) > > At least it has a bunch of dependencies, that's what non-trivial meant > in my mail. > > <http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/db-commons-sandbox/db-common > s-grafolia/gump_work/build_db-commons-sandbox_db-commons-grafolia.html> > does run unit tests. > > Hmm, in > <http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/excalibur/excalibur-thread-i > mpl/gump_work/build_excalibur_excalibur-thread-impl.html> > the unit tests fail to compile even though the project lists a > dependency on JUnit, while Grafolia (which works) does not declare > such a dependency. > > We really need help from people who understand Maven better than I do > to take the final steps. It seems we are pretty close. Want to come > over to [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dion? > > Stefan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
