Brett Porter wrote:
> The "contribution" comes almost entirely from the Ant codebase. Sorry if
> I didn't make that clear from the commit message.
I re-read the commit messages, and no it was not entirely clear, at least
not in terms of the clarity I'd want for IP clearance. The concern is
tracking provenance.
Ant is in Subversion. If these are patched versions of Ant code, why didn't
you use `svn cp` to initially populate the tree, with appropriate comments,
then apply the patches?
> Niklas is not a yet a committer, so doesn't have a CLA. I was under the
> impression his contribution was goverened by the same rules as any patch
> submitted to the mailing list.
Grey areas, but the larger the contributions that more important that we get
a CLA. And, as you noted, the o.a.c.e.launcher package was created by him,
and is not just a set of patches.
> I was also under the impression that the sandbox was equipped to house
> code in the same way as the incubator as official releases are not made
> from there.
Absolutely not. The sandbox is not a substitute incubator.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
