Eric,

Thanks for your reply.

They pointed me to their nightly build, which do to my project guidelines I
a reluctant to use. A recent beta or release candidate would really be nice.

I shall wait for a non-nightly release build from them, however I fear that
that may take awhile.

>There is a bunch of interest in the Slide
>webdavclient, using the latest of HttpClient 2.0 branch

Yes I know, actually I am only interested in the webdavclient.jar. I do not
use any of the other slide .jars. Could you send me a copy of just the
webdavclient.jar which I can use with HttpClient 2.0 beta 1?


Regards,
Daniel


-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 27 July, 2003 4:56 AM
To: Commons HttpClient Project
Subject: Re: Commons-HttpClient conflict with WebDAVClient


Daniel,

Sorry I didn't respond sooner, but I was on vacation. I'm hoping you've
gotten an answer on the Slide mailing list, but I've not had a chance to
check.

I've been doing some work to keep the latest code in Slide up-to-date
with the latest of HttpClient 2.0.

You should have success there. There is a bunch of interest in the Slide
webdavclient, using the latest of HttpClient 2.0 branch, so it should be
relatively easy to work with.

There is currently a patch outstanding which should help matters
somewhat, as well. The Slide folks tend to be a lot less responsive then
the excellent group here at HttpClient, so it may not be as smooth as
you like.

-Eric.

Daniel Joshua wrote:

>Thanks.
>
>
>
>>You will have a lot more luck asking these questions on the slide
>>mailing list since they've actually looked at the code in the past
>>year. :)
>>
>>
>
>I have joined & posted on the Slide list... so far the list is quiet, guess
>it is a low traffic mailing list.
>
>Regards,
>Daniel
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Adrian Sutton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, 24 July, 2003 4:47 PM
>To: Commons HttpClient Project
>Subject: Re: Commons-HttpClient conflict with WebDAVClient
>
>
>
>On Thursday, July 24, 2003, at 06:02  PM, Daniel Joshua wrote:
>
>
>
>>>Yes actually, but it's a bit of a nasty hack that was done before
>>>slide
>>>was actually updated to HttpClient 2.0 (there were a lot of API
>>>changes
>>>between 1.0 and 2.0).
>>>
>>>
>>"before slide was actually updated"?
>>so now the latest WebDAVClient has which version of HttpClient ?
>>eg. HttpClient 2.0 beta 1 or 2 ?
>>
>>
>
>I have no idea, I do know that it was updated in the past few months
>and they were planning to keep it in sync with HttpClient releases.
>I'd suggest you download the slide source code, rip out the HttpClient
>classes then compile your own jar against whatever version you like
>(beta 2 would be my recommendation).  You may need to tweak a few
>things in Slide, but most likely it will just work.
>
>You will have a lot more luck asking these questions on the slide
>mailing list since they've actually looked at the code in the past
>year. :)
>
>
>
>>Regards,
>>Daniel
>>
>>
>
>Regards,
>
>Adrian Sutton.
>
>----------------------------------------------
>Intencha "tomorrow's technology today"
>Ph: 38478913 0422236329
>Suite 8/29 Oatland Crescent
>Holland Park West 4121
>Australia QLD
>www.intencha.com
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to