Hi Mario, > -----Original Message----- > From: Mario Ivankovits [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: lundi 17 juillet 2006 08:25 > To: Jakarta Commons Users List > Subject: Re: [VFS] Why resolveFile API doesn't accepting URI ? > > Hi! > > I've just tried to use VFS and I was surprised to see that the > resolveFile > > API does not have a signature accepting a URI object. > I think (this decision were felt before I jumped to VFS) the main reason > is, that vfs supports "layered" URIs. So you can have > tar:gz:http://www....... > The java URI class cant really deal with this, can it?
I think it can. See http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/net/URI.html They give this example in the javadoc: urn:isbn:096139210x In addition the general format is: [scheme:]scheme-specific-part[#fragment] I'm not an expert but I guess one could consider that the scheme is "tar:gz:http" in your example above. Thanks! -Vincent ___________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Mail réinvente le mail ! Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail et son interface révolutionnaire. http://fr.mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
