Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Mario,
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Ivankovits [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: lundi 17 juillet 2006 08:25
To: Jakarta Commons Users List
Subject: Re: [VFS] Why resolveFile API doesn't accepting URI ?
Hi!
I've just tried to use VFS and I was surprised to see that the
resolveFile
API does not have a signature accepting a URI object.
I think (this decision were felt before I jumped to VFS) the main reason
is, that vfs supports "layered" URIs. So you can have
tar:gz:http://www.......
The java URI class cant really deal with this, can it?
I think it can. See
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/net/URI.html
They give this example in the javadoc:
urn:isbn:096139210x
In addition the general format is: [scheme:]scheme-specific-part[#fragment]
I'm not an expert but I guess one could consider that the scheme is
"tar:gz:http" in your example above.
not at all : the scheme is "tar" and the scheme specific part is the
remainder ; unfortunately, the URI class doesn't perform further parsing
for the other parts because the RFCs doesn't specify a separator ; VFS
uses "!"
--
Cordialement,
///
(. .)
--------ooO--(_)--Ooo--------
| Philippe Poulard |
-----------------------------
http://reflex.gforge.inria.fr/
Have the RefleX !
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
