Re: Jelly email

[Paul Libbrecht]

Should we set as requirement compatibility to the previous email tag-lib or should we just do this an email2 tag-lib ? Considering our forces, I'd target email2.

Mark, for the ASF to accept your contribution, we need a signed CLA, see
   http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas
Tell us how acceptable this is.

paul

Dion Gillard wrote:

It'd be interesting to see how well this would integrate in with the
existing mail stuff.

On 9/27/06, Mark Tombs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

As promised, some example jelly. Putting multipart=true is a terrible hack

but I couldn't think of a way to tell if the mail:mail tag contained any
parts at the time.
And I can't do multiple to or from, as I didn't need it at the time of
writing either.

<!-- connect to the smtp server -->

<mail:setServer type="smtp" server="mailserver.notreal.com" port="25" />

<!-- to send a simple, text mail -->

<mail:mail to="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" from="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
subject="example simple mail">
This is just a text mail.
</mail:mail>

<!-- send a multi-part mail -->

<mail:mail to="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" from="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
subject="example simple mail" multipart="true">
  <mail:part type="html" encoding="utf-8">
        <h1>This an html mail.</h1>
  </mail:part>
  <mail:part type="plain">
       This is the plain text part.
  </mail:part>
  <mail:part type="image/png" file="path-to-a-file.png" />
  <mail:part type="image/png" file="path-to-another-file.png" />
</mail:mail>

<!-- get mails from a pop server -->

    <mail:setServer type="POP" server="pop.fake.com" userName="user"
password="********" />

    <mail:getMessages var="messages" folder="inbox" />
        <core:forEach items="${messages}" var="message">
           <!-- do something to the mails -->
       </core:forEach>




On 9/26/06, Mark Tombs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hmmm, same dependencies I'm afraid.  I'll sort out some example jelly
> later on.
>
> Mark
>
>
> On 9/26/06, Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >

> > dependencies of commons-jelly-email have been a problem to many.
> > If you can minimize this, it would be interesting.
> > Can you also send an example jelly snippet ?
> >
> > paul
> >
> >
> > Mark Tombs wrote:

> > > mails

> > > thought you might be interested.
> > >
> > > On 9/26/06, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Mark,
> > >>

> > >>
> > >> http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jelly/libs/email/
> > >>
> > >> On 9/25/06, Mark Tombs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> > Hi
> > >> >
> > >> > I've written some jelly tags for creating emails that can send
> > >> multi-part

> > some
> > >> tags

> >
> > >> >

> > >> recently, and

> > >> active at
> > >> > the moment?
> > >> >
> > >> > thanks
> > >> >
> > >> > Mark
> > >> >
> > >> >

> > What are the dependencies ? I know that the javamail (and activation) > > > Its completely new. I wrote it for my own use, for sending multi-part > > > with both plain text and html parts. Its still work in progress, but I > > >> is this an extension of the existing email taglib? Or something new? > > >> > mails, including html and attachments. I've also started writing > > >> > that can read mail too. Is this of any interest to the jelly team? > > >> > On another note, I haven't noticed a lot of development of jelly > > >> > the ant and maven builds are getting out of date... is the project > >

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature