Got the OK from the boss, and the signed CLA will be in the post soon.  So 
where do we go from here?

Mark

On Wednesday 04 October 2006 16:43, Mark Tombs wrote:
> Thanks, I'll let you know.
>
> On 10/4/06, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd happily go with an email2
> >
> > On 10/4/06, Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Should we set as requirement compatibility to the previous email
> > > tag-lib or should we just do this an email2 tag-lib ? Considering our
> > > forces, I'd target email2.
> > >
> > > Mark, for the ASF to accept your contribution, we need a signed CLA,
> > > see http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas
> > > Tell us how acceptable this is.
> > >
> > > paul
> > >
> > > Dion Gillard wrote:
> > > > It'd be interesting to see how well this would integrate in with the
> > > > existing mail stuff.
> > > >
> > > > On 9/27/06, Mark Tombs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >> As promised, some example jelly. Putting multipart=true is a
> > > >> terrible hack
> > > >> but I couldn't think of a way to tell if the mail:mail tag contained
> >
> > any
> >
> > > >> parts at the time.
> > > >> And I can't do multiple to or from, as I didn't need it at the time
> >
> > of
> >
> > > >> writing either.
> > > >>
> > > >> <!-- connect to the smtp server -->
> > > >>
> > > >> <mail:setServer type="smtp" server="mailserver.notreal.com"
> > > >> port="25"
> >
> > />
> >
> > > >> <!-- to send a simple, text mail -->
> > > >>
> > > >> <mail:mail to="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" from="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> > > >> subject="example simple mail">
> > > >> This is just a text mail.
> > > >> </mail:mail>
> > > >>
> > > >> <!-- send a multi-part mail -->
> > > >>
> > > >> <mail:mail to="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" from="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> > > >> subject="example simple mail" multipart="true">
> > > >>   <mail:part type="html" encoding="utf-8">
> > > >>         <h1>This an html mail.</h1>
> > > >>   </mail:part>
> > > >>   <mail:part type="plain">
> > > >>        This is the plain text part.
> > > >>   </mail:part>
> > > >>   <mail:part type="image/png" file="path-to-a-file.png" />
> > > >>   <mail:part type="image/png" file="path-to-another-file.png" />
> > > >> </mail:mail>
> > > >>
> > > >> <!-- get mails from a pop server -->
> > > >>
> > > >>     <mail:setServer type="POP" server="pop.fake.com" userName="user"
> > > >> password="********" />
> > > >>
> > > >>     <mail:getMessages var="messages" folder="inbox" />
> > > >>         <core:forEach items="${messages}" var="message">
> > > >>            <!-- do something to the mails -->
> > > >>        </core:forEach>
> > > >>
> > > >> On 9/26/06, Mark Tombs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >> > Hmmm, same dependencies I'm afraid.  I'll sort out some example
> >
> > jelly
> >
> > > >> > later on.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Mark
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On 9/26/06, Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >> > > What are the dependencies ? I know that the javamail (and
> > > >>
> > > >> activation)
> > > >>
> > > >> > > dependencies of commons-jelly-email have been a problem to many.
> > > >> > > If you can minimize this, it would be interesting.
> > > >> > > Can you also send an example jelly snippet ?
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > paul
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Mark Tombs wrote:
> > > >> > > > Its completely new. I wrote it for my own use, for sending
> > > >>
> > > >> multi-part
> > > >>
> > > >> > > > mails
> > > >> > > > with both plain text and html parts. Its still work in
> > > >>
> > > >> progress, but I
> > > >>
> > > >> > > > thought you might be interested.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > On 9/26/06, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > >> > > >> Mark,
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> is this an extension of the existing email taglib? Or
> > > >>
> > > >> something new?
> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jelly/libs/email/
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> On 9/25/06, Mark Tombs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >> > > >> > Hi
> > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> > > >> > I've written some jelly tags for creating emails that can
> >
> > send
> >
> > > >> > > >> multi-part
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> > mails, including html and attachments. I've also started
> > > >>
> > > >> writing
> > > >>
> > > >> > > some
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > >> tags
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> > that can read mail too.  Is this of any interest to the
> > > >>
> > > >> jelly team?
> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> > On another note, I haven't noticed a lot of development of
> > > >>
> > > >> jelly
> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> recently, and
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> > the ant and maven builds are getting out of date... is the
> > > >>
> > > >> project
> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> active at
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> > the moment?
> > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> > > >> > thanks
> > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> > > >> > Mark
> >
> > --
> > http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
> > Rule of Acquisition #91: Hear all, trust nothing.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to