> > > Although I'm parallelizing in not SMP systems but a cluster of loosely > coupled (small) computers connected through moderate speed networks > using broadcasting positions, this may not change the vlaue of > avoiding redundancies. I'll study more when implementing > pre-knowledge or some. Thanks.
Do you have the winning rate of your best parallel algorithm against the sequential version in 9x9 Go in such a setting without shared memory ? We stay below 80% for this form of parallelization (but this speed-up can be cumulated with SMP speed-up), whenever we use fast networks (infiniband). In 19x19, it's much better, but the MPI parallelization of 9x9 Go is challenging. Best regards, Olivier
_______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
