Christoph Birk wrote: > On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Olivier Teytaud wrote: >> In 19x19, it's much better, but the MPI parallelization of 9x9 Go is >> challenging. > > The bright side here is that 9x9 is not really important but just > a test bed. If it works for 19x19, that's good.
The same problems will nail you when you get more processors or a more narrow tree (because of pruning). -- GCP _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
