On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 9:57 AM, tjpa <t...@tjpa.com> wrote: > I think you have not been keeping up with this field. There are a number of > ways to randomize built into these programs. To insist that the product is > no good because you want it to use it in a silly way is just silly. And > nothing will prevent you from using it in a silly way. Your objection is > that it doesn't include special features that encourage your using it in a > silly way.
I keep up with such applications quite well, and I am fully aware of what you speak. I remain convinced that I should have the opportunity to be just as silly as I want to be. It could even be that what seems silly to you may not seem silly to others. Neither myself or any other here, to the best of my knowledge, has written a single word about any product being "no good" because it lacks a stylus for input, a device that to you and Mr. Jobs find to be silly. Please, let us try to be factual in our statements. Steve ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
