+1 to both. Karl
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Jack Krupansky < jack.krupan...@lucidimagination.com> wrote: > +1 to both - review of name and address the NTLM issue since ACF is getting > closer to where an actual 0.1 release could be considered. > > -- Jack Krupansky > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Grant Ingersoll" <grant.ingers...@gmail.com> > Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 1:35 PM > To: <connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Pick your preferred name > > > ACF passed the Incubator vote. >> >> My question to the community is do you want me to go to the Board and ask >> for advice on this since the Board ultimately approves any podling >> graduating? One Director weighed in on the vote saying the Board wouldn't >> care, but in my view it was not an official opinion. >> >> I was actually thinking about asking the board for two things: >> 1. View of the name >> 2. Whether they have guidance on our repeated request about NTLM and it's >> inclusion in any ACF release. I believe someone was slated to engage with >> us a few months back, but I don't believe anyone has reached out to us yet. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> -Grant >> >> On Sep 7, 2010, at 4:54 AM, Karl Wright wrote: >> >> Voting is now closed. >>> >>> Final tally (which only counts Robert's first choice and not all three): >>> >>> Apache Connectors Framework 15 >>> Apache Manifold 11 >>> Apache Yukon 9 >>> Apache Macon 4 >>> Apache ManifoldCF 3 >>> Apache Omni 1 >>> Apache Acromantula 1 >>> Apache Lukon 1 >>> >>> Karl >>> >> >> -------------------------- >> Grant Ingersoll >> http://lucenerevolution.org Apache Lucene/Solr Conference, Boston Oct 7-8 >> >>
