What I would like to see are "dependancy relationships" between packages displayed in a graphic way. See it as a sort of tree-like network diagram (ever seen cheops, for displaying networks), from the bottom the kernel (and other base-sys packages) and you build your way up. This way it should be easier to figure out what the real relationships are (a KDE app needs qt, but this dependancy is obselete since it also needs kde-base and kde-base needs qt). I don't know how usefull this is for the user, maybe it's nice 4 developpers... Although I'm not a "real" developper, I've had some pretty "wild dreams" about this... ;-) Stefan
- Re: [Cooker] [discuss] HOWTOS Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] [discuss] HOWT... Brook humphrey
- Re: [Cooker] [discuss] HOWT... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] [discuss] HOWT... Brook humphrey
- Re: [Cooker] [discuss] HOWTOS Denis HAVLIK
- [Cooker] DISCUSSION/Packages: Games, games and games cteg
- Re: [Cooker] DISCUSSION/Packages: Games, games a... Guillaume Cottenceau
- RE: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION configuration... B. K. Barley
- RE: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION Internet Util... B. K. Barley
- RE: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION rpmdrake... Guillaume Rousse
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - Pa... Stefan van der Eijk
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - Pay less at... Hoyt
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - Pay le... Serge Lussier
- [Cooker] couple of bugs Lorne Shantz
- RE: [Cooker] couple of bugs Andrew
- Re: [Cooker] couple of bugs Lorne Shantz
- Re: [Cooker] couple of bugs Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] couple of bugs Vincent Danen
- Re: [Cooker] couple of bugs Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] couple of bugs Vincent Danen
- Re: [Cooker] couple of bugs Pixel