On Fri Sep 26, 2003 at 04:17:48AM -0400, Brook Humphrey wrote: > > I don't mind pure-ftpd being default, although it we want secure I still > > maintain that vsftpd is what we want. Can't beat it for security. Of > > course, it's a little spartan on the feature side as well. > > I'll admit here that I'm not very familiar with vsftpd but I can say pure-ftpd > is not spartan at all and is constantly being maintained.
Well, I will have to look at it. I've never looked at it before, I've only used vsftpd and proftpd (and wu way back when). Non-spartan is nice... the thing I like about proftpd is how customizable is (and I like the apache-like config syntax) -- MandrakeSoft Security; http://www.mandrakesecure.net/ Online Security Resource Book; http://linsec.ca/ "lynx -source http://linsec.ca/vdanen.asc | gpg --import" {FE6F2AFD : 88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7 66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD}
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
