So sprach Pixel am Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 08:14:00PM +0100:
> the 'ALL' pb is a big pain. If we install too much people complain (eg:
> aspell-cs => 64MB), and in the opposite people complain (eg: complain they have
> X http servers running)
Although I really think he did not choose the right words, he really hit
something true here. Selecting ALL in combination with a language really
should mean ALL language independent packages plus the packages for the
chosen language.
And that's also the difference between aspell-cs and joe. aspell-cs is just
the Czech language package for aspell, and thus very likely will only be
used by Czech people plus a tiny minority of others.
Joe on the other hand may be used by a lot more people, that is, by anyone
who's able to speak English. That would be anyone starting with Linux.
And heck, why should aspell-cs *NOT* be installed when selecting ALL? After
all, ALL means every available package. Well, maybe there should be an
option "ALL" and "ALL with EVERY language".
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english)
Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.dp.ath.cx
GnuPG ID: 59F6A6F5 FP: DC8AFA56C492EE6058D5 BAA62EEE3AD559F6A6F5
ICQ: 7328191 Uptime: 7 hours 0 minutes
