On Sunday 19 November 2000 23:27, you wrote:
> So sprach Pixel am Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 08:14:00PM +0100:
> > the 'ALL' pb is a big pain. If we install too much people complain (eg:
> > aspell-cs => 64MB), and in the opposite people complain (eg: complain
> > they have X http servers running)
>
> Although I really think he did not choose the right words, he really hit
> something true here. Selecting ALL in combination with a language really
> should mean ALL language independent packages plus the packages for the
> chosen language.
>
> And that's also the difference between aspell-cs and joe. aspell-cs is
> just the Czech language package for aspell, and thus very likely will only
> be used by Czech people plus a tiny minority of others.
>
> Joe on the other hand may be used by a lot more people, that is, by anyone
> who's able to speak English. That would be anyone starting with Linux.
>
> And heck, why should aspell-cs *NOT* be installed when selecting ALL?
> After all, ALL means every available package. Well, maybe there should be
> an option "ALL" and "ALL with EVERY language".
>
or only ALL EVRy language ,( the dialog refer to language not directly to
package).
it will be more clear to specify that but not necessary , it's not a real
problem .
> Alexander Skwar
