Eugenio Diaz wrote:
> XFS is a proven (in my opinion the
> best) enterprise class file system. It brings
> performance, scalability, security, QoS features,
> uptime, and more to Linux. I don't think reiserfs and
> XFS can be put in the same category. Just to start,
> XFS is a port of a proven product, while reiserfs is a
> *relatively* new and unproven product.
And my thought was: since most of the ground-breaking work for a JFS of
any kind has been done for ReiserFS, would it not be relatively simple
to plug XFS (and later JFS and others, NTFS (joking!), who knows) into
the process?
--
There was a young bard of Japan
Whose limericks never would scan
When they said it was so,
He replied, "Yes, I know,
But I always try to fit as many syllables into the last line as I
possibly can."
