On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 09:20:47 GMT, Alan Bateman <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Naoto Sato has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 726 commits:
>> 
>>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk-sandbox/json' into 
>> JDK-8381976-Implementation-for-Simple-JSON-API
>>  - Address comment regarding asDouble wording in class spec
>>  - Reflects Alan's comments
>>  - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8381976-Implementation-for-Simple-JSON-API
>>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk-sandbox/json' into 
>> JDK-8381976-Implementation-for-Simple-JSON-API
>>  - Removed unused imports
>>  - Removed unnecessary qualifiers
>>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk-sandbox/json' into 
>> JDK-8381976-Implementation-for-Simple-JSON-API
>>  - Merge branch 'toDisplayString' into json
>>  - wording
>>  - ... and 716 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/16bf2730...76272098
>
> test/jdk/jdk/incubator/json/TestOtherImpl.java line 29:
> 
>> 27:  * @test
>> 28:  * @bug 8381976
>> 29:  * @summary Tests for other implementations that extend JsonValue 
>> sub-interfaces
> 
> For now at least, 
> JsonString/JsonNumber/JsonObject/JsonArray/JsonBoolean/JsonNull are 
> non-sealed, but the test for this "extension point" only tests two 
> custom-JsonString methods. Are there other generate tests that could be added 
> here?

Can create tests that verify those sub-interfaces are non-sealed.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32282#discussion_r3797823222

Reply via email to