core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8380085: jpackage (Linux) launcher crashes with SIGSEGV when input contains large number of JAR files [v2] xeu-giayoei
  • Re: RFR: 8380085: jpackage (Linux) launcher crashes with SIGSEGV when input contains large number of JAR files [v2] xeu-giayoei
  • Re: RFR: 8380085: jpackage (Linux) launcher crashes with SIGSEGV when input contains large number of JAR files [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8380085: jpackage (Linux) launcher crashes with SIGSEGV when input contains large number of JAR files [v3] xeu-giayoei
  • Re: RFR: 8380085: jpackage (Linux) launcher crashes with SIGSEGV when input contains large number of JAR files [v3] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8380085: jpackage (Linux) launcher crashes with SIGSEGV when input contains large number of JAR files [v3] sseu-buhuzzi
  • Re: RFR: 8380085: jpackage (Linux) launcher crashes with SIGSEGV when input contains large number of JAR files [v3] duke
  • Integrated: 8380085: jpackage (Linux) launcher crashes with SIGSEGV when input contains large number of JAR files sseu-buhuzzi
• Withdrawn: 8374610: Make ByteArrayOutputStream.ensureCapacity(int) protected duke
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v58] Doug Lea
• Withdrawn: 8371711: AArch64: SVE intrinsics for Arrays.sort methods (int, float) duke
• RFR: 8380076: Refactor accessFlags() parsing in core reflection Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8380076: Refactor accessFlags() parsing in core reflection [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8380076: Refactor accessFlags() parsing in core reflection [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8380076: Refactor accessFlags() parsing in core reflection [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8380076: Refactor accessFlags() parsing in core reflection [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8380076: Refactor accessFlags() parsing in core reflection [v2] Shaojin Wen
• RFR: 8377456: GetObjectSizeIntrinsicsTest.java, ARRAY_HEADER_SIZE wrong for 32-bit Simon Tooke
  • Re: RFR: 8377456: GetObjectSizeIntrinsicsTest.java, ARRAY_HEADER_SIZE wrong for 32-bit Thomas Stuefe
• RFR: 8278591: Jpackage post installation information message Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8278591: Jpackage post installation information message Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8278591: Jpackage post installation information message [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8278591: Jpackage post installation information message [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8278591: Jpackage post installation information message [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8278591: Jpackage post installation information message [v3] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8278591: Jpackage post installation information message [v3] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8278591: Jpackage post installation information message [v3] Alexander Matveev
  • Integrated: 8278591: Jpackage post installation information message Alexey Semenyuk
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v57] Doug Lea
• RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message John R Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v2] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v3] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v4] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v4] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v4] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v4] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v4] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v4] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v4] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v4] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v4] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v4] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v5] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v5] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v5] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v5] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v5] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v6] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v7] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v7] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v8] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v8] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v9] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v9] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v9] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v9] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v9] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v9] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v9] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v9] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v10] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v11] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v11] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v12] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v13] Emanuel Peter
• RFR: 8380033: Test java/util/jar/Manifest/IncludeInExceptionsTest.java could be more agnostic to VM default Christoph Langer
  • Re: RFR: 8380033: Test java/util/jar/Manifest/IncludeInExceptionsTest.java could be more agnostic to VM default Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8380033: Test java/util/jar/Manifest/IncludeInExceptionsTest.java could be more agnostic to VM default Christoph Langer
  • Re: RFR: 8380033: Test java/util/jar/Manifest/IncludeInExceptionsTest.java could be more agnostic to VM default Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8380033: Test java/util/jar/Manifest/IncludeInExceptionsTest.java could be more agnostic to VM default Christoph Langer
  • Integrated: 8380033: Test java/util/jar/Manifest/IncludeInExceptionsTest.java could be more agnostic to VM default Christoph Langer
• RFR: 8378657: OutputAnalyzer should have a quiet mode Frederic Thevenet
  • Re: RFR: 8378657: OutputAnalyzer should have a quiet mode Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8378657: OutputAnalyzer should have a quiet mode [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8378657: OutputAnalyzer should have a quiet mode Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8378657: OutputAnalyzer should have a quiet mode Frederic Thevenet
  • Re: RFR: 8378657: OutputAnalyzer should have a quiet mode Frederic Thevenet
  • Re: RFR: 8378657: OutputAnalyzer should have a quiet mode [v2] Frederic Thevenet
  • Re: RFR: 8378657: OutputAnalyzer should have a quiet mode [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8378657: OutputAnalyzer should have a quiet mode [v2] Frederic Thevenet
  • Re: RFR: 8378657: OutputAnalyzer should have a quiet mode [v2] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8378657: OutputAnalyzer should have a quiet mode [v2] Frederic Thevenet
  • Re: RFR: 8378657: OutputAnalyzer should have a quiet mode [v2] David Holmes
  • Integrated: 8378657: OutputAnalyzer should have a quiet mode Frederic Thevenet
• Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v6] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v6] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v6] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v6] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v6] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v6] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v6] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v6] Alan Bateman
• Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v5] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v5] Alan Bateman
• Re: RFR: 8358521: Optimize vector operations by reassociating broadcasted inputs [v7] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8358521: Optimize vector operations by reassociating broadcasted inputs [v7] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8358521: Optimize vector operations by reassociating broadcasted inputs [v7] Xiaohong Gong
  • Re: RFR: 8358521: Optimize vector operations by reassociating broadcasted inputs [v7] Jatin Bhateja
• RFR: 8379967: (process) Improve Processbuilder error reporting Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8379967: (process) Improve Processbuilder error reporting Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8379967: (process) Improve ProcessBuilder error reporting Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8379967: (process) Improve ProcessBuilder error reporting [v2] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8379967: (process) Improve ProcessBuilder error reporting [v2] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8379967: (process) Improve ProcessBuilder error reporting [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8379967: (process) Improve ProcessBuilder error reporting [v2] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8379967: (process) Improve ProcessBuilder error reporting [v2] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8379967: (process) Improve ProcessBuilder error reporting [v3] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8379967: (process) Improve ProcessBuilder error reporting [v3] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379967: (process) Improve ProcessBuilder error reporting [v3] Thomas Stuefe
  • Integrated: 8379967: (process) Improve ProcessBuilder error reporting Thomas Stuefe
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v17] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v17] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v17] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v17] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v17] Jatin Bhateja
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v29] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v29] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v29] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v29] Emanuel Peter
• RFR: 8379828: Remove ResourceBundle module tests with legacy ISO code property Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8379828: Remove ResourceBundle module tests with legacy ISO code property Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8379828: Remove ResourceBundle module tests with legacy ISO code property Iris Clark
  • Integrated: 8379828: Remove ResourceBundle module tests with legacy ISO code property Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8379828: Remove ResourceBundle module tests with legacy ISO code property Naoto Sato
• RFR: 8379938: [macos] jpackage SigningPackageTest test doesn't create .pkg and .dmg bundles Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8379938: [macos] jpackage SigningPackageTest test doesn't create .pkg and .dmg bundles Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8379938: [macos] jpackage SigningPackageTest test doesn't create .pkg and .dmg bundles Alexander Matveev
  • Integrated: 8379938: [macos] jpackage SigningPackageTest test doesn't create .pkg and .dmg bundles Alexey Semenyuk
• RFR: 8379182: [test] java/lang/ProcessBuilder/PipelineLeaksFD.java fails Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8379182: [test] java/lang/ProcessBuilder/PipelineLeaksFD.java fails Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8379182: [test] java/lang/ProcessBuilder/PipelineLeaksFD.java fails [v3] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8379182: [test] java/lang/ProcessBuilder/PipelineLeaksFD.java fails [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8379182: [test] java/lang/ProcessBuilder/PipelineLeaksFD.java fails [v3] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8379182: [test] java/lang/ProcessBuilder/PipelineLeaksFD.java fails [v4] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8379182: [test] java/lang/ProcessBuilder/PipelineLeaksFD.java fails [v4] Thomas Stuefe
  • Integrated: 8379182: [test] java/lang/ProcessBuilder/PipelineLeaksFD.java fails Roger Riggs
• Re: RFR: 8366444: Add support for add/mul reduction operations for Float16 [v7] Bhavana Kilambi
  • Re: RFR: 8366444: Add support for add/mul reduction operations for Float16 [v7] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8366444: Add support for add/mul reduction operations for Float16 [v7] Xiaohong Gong
  • Re: RFR: 8366444: Add support for add/mul reduction operations for Float16 [v7] Xiaohong Gong
  • Re: RFR: 8366444: Add support for add/mul reduction operations for Float16 [v7] Yi Wu
• RFR: 8377004: Java Launcher allows inheriting a package-private main from another package Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8377004: Java Launcher allows inheriting a package-private main from another package David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8377004: Java Launcher allows inheriting a package-private main from another package Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8377004: Java Launcher allows inheriting a package-private main from another package Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377004: Java Launcher allows inheriting a package-private main from another package [v2] Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8377004: Java Launcher allows inheriting a package-private main from another package Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8377004: Java Launcher allows inheriting a package-private main from another package Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8377004: Java Launcher allows inheriting a package-private main from another package Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8377004: Java Launcher allows inheriting a package-private main from another package [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8377004: Java Launcher allows inheriting a package-private main from another package [v2] Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8377004: Java Launcher allows inheriting a package-private main from another package [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377004: Java Launcher allows inheriting a package-private main from another package [v2] Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8377004: Java Launcher allows inheriting a package-private main from another package [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377004: Java Launcher allows inheriting a package-private main from another package [v3] Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8377004: Java Launcher allows inheriting a package-private main from another package [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8377004: Java Launcher incorrectly allows inheriting a package-private main from another package [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Integrated: 8377004: Java Launcher incorrectly allows inheriting a package-private main from another package Jan Lahoda
• RFR: JDK-8379802: unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header Christoph Langer
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header [v2] Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header Christoph Langer
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header [v3] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header [v3] Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header [v3] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header [v4] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header [v4] Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header [v4] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header [v5] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header [v5] Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header [v5] Christoph Langer
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header [v5] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header [v5] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header [v5] Thomas Stuefe
  • Integrated: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header Matthias Baesken
• Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v4] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v4] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v4] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v4] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v4] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v4] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v4] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v4] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v4] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v4] David Beaumont
• Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v3] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v3] David Beaumont
• Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v2] David Beaumont

• Earlier messages
• Later messages